Dnsmasq Active Directory Srv Records In Dns

MrFidget DD-WRT User Joined: 15 Jul 2010 Posts: 377 Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:09 Post subject: Resurrecting an old thread. Have you tried using DNSMasq to forward DNS requests to the AD server? I found some stuff in setting up OpenVPN routed tunnels and DNS requests. You must, however, set no DNS rebind to off I haven't tried it properly, but have got DNS lookups working across the tunnel Cheers Chris sefs DD-WRT User Joined: 01 Oct 2008 Posts: 130 Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 23:05 Post subject: I am wanting to do this same exact thing. I am thinking there must be someway to tell dchp via dnsmasq that when a domain client connects push it the ip of the domain controller as its dns server otherwise use the router.

And then in the dns forwarder of the domain controller you put the ip address of the dd-wrt router. In this scenario if it were possible. If a non-domain client is on the lan then it would use the router directly as dns. If the client connects to the domain then it would get the DC as the dns. Donald7777 DD-WRT Novice Joined: 18 Aug 2010 Posts: 32 Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 2:13 Post subject: I had this semi working on an older wrt54g linksys router. It is not worth the trouble.

Server 2008 with AD must have DNS installed and be the ruler. I ran into DNS problems that traced back to the router, when I set Server 2008 as DNS everything cleared up. MrFidget DD-WRT User Joined: 15 Jul 2010 Posts: 377 Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:26 Post subject: I have Succeeded in doing it using it using build v15962 which has a 'no DNS rebind' option. On the services tab, in your Additional DNSMasq options set Code: server=/windows-domain.local/172.16.10.1 Works well for me. Network browser works using AD lookups.

Has all the options for DNSmasq. You leave out the -- for your.conf file just type the name of the option. You can debug your settings by checking the settings in /tmp/dnsmasq.conf Let me know how you go /C MrFidget DD-WRT User Joined: 15 Jul 2010 Posts: 377 Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:41 Post subject: BTW, This was on a branch router with no local AD server.

Jun 13, 2016 - I have setup a raspberry PI and downloaded the DNSMASQ system. The raspberry pi (sudo init 0 power off and on) then the DNS forwarding stops working. A SRV record sending LDAP for the example.com domain to. DNSMasq for Windows Server 2008 Active Directory. DD-WRT Forum Forum Index-> Generic Questions: View previous topic:: View next topic.

I was connecting to head office using OpenVPN. Head office has a 5Mb symetric link and the branch was on an ADSL2+ 18Mb down 1Mb up. Driver dlya veb kameri samsung vg stc 2000 2. The computers had already been added to the domain. Routers are Cisco / Linksys E3000s /C mistika12 DD-WRT Novice Joined: 10 Mar 2015 Posts: 1 Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 19:53 Post subject: How can I tell the router to update DNS records on DC when it gives new IP address to a host computer? I have DHPC on my ddwrt router and DNS server on Windows 2003 DC.

The problem is that DNS table on the DC is not always accurate and sometimes contains old IP addresses for some hosts. The router is Asus WL500gPV2 with DD-WRT v24-sp2 (08/07/10) mega SVN revision 14896). The DNSMasq options are: dhcp-option=6, 192.168.5.3, 192.168.5.1 strict-order address=/mydomain/192.168.5.3 address=/mydomain.corp/192.168.5.3 192.168.5.1 - router 192.168.5.3 - DC with DNS server Display posts from previous: Page 1 of 1 -> All times are GMT Navigation.

Commonly it would require an authoritative DNS server to serve records and not just a resolver. However, dnsmasq has apparently the option to serve/resolve records for private domains.

Suppose your router utilizes the vanilla resolver kresd (knot reolver) in which case you might want to look up the respective documentation - I am not familiar with it and thus cannot assist. Else and alternatively there is unbound (my preference) as resolver which can either use dnsmasq (in tandem) for resolving private domains or it can serve (and resolve) records for private domain on its own.

It depends what you want. For some use cases dnsmasq is better, for some it certainly isn’t (even on a router). Dnsmasq has an advantage here that it has always been designed specifically to run on routers whereas knot-resolver is not. Even so, I believe for most router users knot-resolver is better than dnsmasq (including my own Omnia), but my opinion on this isn’t really relevant here (and perhaps not even “trust-worthy” as I develop knot-resolver) – it’s about the choice of each person (for their device) and of the Turris team (for the default).

It is possible to run with dnsmasq only on Omnia, though reportedly there were some problems with updates (I don’t really know, you can search this forum). To expand on other choices, some people on this forum prefer to ditch whole Turris OS for plain OpenWRT, or use a different HW. Vcunat: Dnsmasq has an advantage here that it has always been designed specifically to run on routers whereas knot-resolver is not. I have seen videos of talk at ripe et.al where turris folks share their frustration of making a dns resolver work with the professional community and earn sympathy. I think most users (here) would sympathize as well. The ratio of issues caused by vs. Issues solved by knot for turris users further indicates that it might not be warranted to shove this onto unsupecting con-/prosumers (as a default) when there is something with a better feature set (for the job) already available.